The future of influence
AI tools and human creators are already part of the same trust ecosystem. The next question is whether AI influencers, synthetic personalities designed to recommend and persuade, can join them. The answer is complicated.
A holding pattern, not a rejection
Consumers still trust human creators more than AI influencers. But the data paints a more nuanced picture. 16% of consumers would already trust an AI influencer as much as a human creator, and a further 27% are open but more cautious. Combined, more than four in ten are open to the idea.
Another 27% are sceptical. But scepticism isn't rejection. Opinions shift, and the industry should be paying attention.
Where the scepticism actually comes from
Scepticism about AI influencers connects back to a wider trust gap: 25% of consumers say they're not sure what makes any influencer trustworthy, human or otherwise. If consumers haven't fully resolved trust around human creators yet, AI creators are always going to be a tougher sell. But that still leaves a significant share of consumers open to AI influencers in some form. The challenge is less about creating demand than earning credibility. And credibility starts with transparency. Consumers already rank it as the number one trust driver for human creators, and there's no reason synthetic ones will be held to a lower standard.
YouTube is where the two systems already meet
YouTube is where the two are already coexisting. Users on the platform are more likely than those anywhere else to have acted on both a creator recommendation and an AI recommendation, often in the same research session. That's an early signal of where the two systems are heading.
Geography and age both shape openness
The US leads on openness to AI influencers at 47%, meaning nearly half of American consumers would either trust one equally to a human creator or are open to doing so. The UK and France follow at 41%, with Germany trailing at 38%. The pattern holds by age too: openness peaks among 25-34s and stays strong up to 45, then drops sharply with each decade after.
THE MISCONCEPTION
AI will replace human influence.
AI is expanding the influence system, not replacing part of it. For the time being, however, human trust retains a clear premium. The real question for brands isn't AI versus creators, but how to combine both.
KEY TAKEAWAY FOR RETAILERS AND BRANDS
The question isn't AI or creators.
It's how you deploy both to build maximum trust at every stage of the decision journey, and transparency is the cost of entry. Some of that combination is already underway, with AI being used to enhance creator performance through analytics, editing and personalisation.
And the data suggests that this is the winning model: pure AI-generated content is underperforming, while AI working alongside human craft is not.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
How do you see AI changing discovery, trust and influence over the next five years?
Join the debate using #GetAWinWithAwin.
© 2026, AWIN Ltd. All rights reserved. Awin is part of Axel Springer Group. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner.